Connecticut Relies on Ancient Legal Doctrine

Nullum Tempus Occurrit Regi — No Time Runs Against the King.

 

Connecticut Supreme Court Seal

Relying on ancient legal doctrine,  The Connecticut Supreme Court allowed the state to go ahead with a lawsuit overriding state statutes of limitations and repose in State of Connecticut v. Lombardo Brothers Mason Contractors, Inc., Supreme Court of Connecticut (2012) The lawsuit concerned  issues from the 1990 construction of the Connecticut law school library.  From its inception the project was beset with water intrusion.  After incurring more than $15 million in repairs and a nearly 30 year lapse in time the state sued.   The chosen defendants included the  construction manager, design firms, contractors, and others as defendants.
The trial court agreed with the defendants that the applicable statutes of limitations and repose had all lapsed.  The state argued that it didn’t matter Nullum Tempus Occurrit Regi applied and the case should proceed.  The contractors were dumb founded, the contracts themselves cited the statutes of repose as applying.  The court agreed and dismissed the case.
On appeal the Connecticut Supreme court really dug into the origins of nullum tempus occurrit regie.   English law held that because kings bore the weighty burdens of governing, it was unfair to deprive him the right to pursue claims due to his official’s errors.  This gave rise to the sword of nullum tempus occurrit regi.  Basically a corollary to the rule of governmental immunity.  The Connecticut court held that the American states and the federal government inherited these rights from the English upon gaining their independence and may vindicate public rights and protect the public purse.

Connecticut reached a similar result in 1888 using nullum tempus to sustain a government claim.  The policy appears on the rise as  more recent decisions from appellate courts around the United States are using this doctrine.  Connecticut has declared that the common law in this country includes “the ancient unwritten law of England.” They suggest that only the legislature may waive fundamental government rights, not a contracting officer.

This case discloses yet another risk in government contracting.

 

 

 

Clayton Walker (101 Posts)

I'm an Alaskan business attorney. I form businesses, establish operating procedures and manuals to manage risk, I mediate disputes between parties. I litigate disputed matters. I strategize and plan litigation and negotiation of disputes. I perform legal research and briefing to support positions and to controvert your adversaries position. I provide a fair and balanced view of your prospects for recovery so that you can make informed decisions. I enjoy reading a lot of things that many people don't want to spend the time reading.


4 thoughts on “Connecticut Relies on Ancient Legal Doctrine

  1. This looks like something that should get kicked up to the federal courts, because the Connecticut courts apparently created/discovered something that applies to all the states and the federal government. Is that a correct guess on the part of a non-lawyer?

    • To make it to the Supreme Court, a party must petition the court and the court must accept the petition. Most cases won’t make it because the court doesn’t accept the case.

      • Actually, I know that. That’s why I used the word “should”. It seems to be to open up a scenario where a court could charge anyone with something they said happened 20 years ago and good luck proving your innocence since almost nobody remembers where they were, what they were doing, or who they were doing it with decades ago. It would seem to give the government yet more power than it already has.

        • Economic times are hard. Governments are trying to balance budgets all over the nation. They are getting creative with arguments to pass the buck on stale claims to make ends meet. There are a number of other courts that have followed suit recently.

Thanks for looking. I appreciate feed back. . .